One of the main benefits of using a coupled (aka "frying") web content management system (WCMS) is that you get a web application development framework with which to build dynamic content-driven applications. Like nearly all modern web application development frameworks, a coupled CMS provides an implementation of the MVC (Model-View-Controller) pattern. For the less technical reader, the MVC pattern is used in just about all software that provides a user interface. The essence is that the model (the data), the view (how the information is presented and interacted with), and the controller (the business logic of the application) are separate concerns and keeping them separate makes the software more maintainable. I will let Wikipedia provide a further explanation of MVC.
The MVC implementation that comes with a typical WCMS is less flexible than a generic, all purpose web application framework. Your WCMS delivery tier makes a lot of assumptions because it knows that you are primarily trying to publish semi-structured content to some form of document format — probably an HTML page, but possibly some XML-based syndication format. Your WCMS knows roughly what your model looks like (it is a semi-structured content item from the repository that has only the data types that the repository supports); it has certain way of interpreting URLS; and the output is designed to be cached for rapid page loads. Those assumptions are handy because they make less work for the developer. In fact, most of the work on a typical WCMS implementation is done in the templates. There is hardly any work done in the model or controller logic.
But there are times when the assumptions of the CMS are broken. Anyone who has implemented a relatively sophisticated website on a CMS has had the experience of either overloading or working around the MVC pattern that comes with the CMS. The approach that I want to talk about here is what I call the PAC (Placeholder Application Controller) pattern. In a nutshell, this pattern de-emphasizes the roles of the model and controller and overloads the view (template) to support logic for a mini-application. The content item goes from being the model to a placeholder on the website. The controller is used more like a switchboard to dial up the right template.
To a lesser extent, home pages often implement the PAC pattern. In this case, the home page might be a simple empty placeholder page that is assigned a powerful template that queries and features content from across the site. When the controller grabs the template and model, it may only think that it is rendering the content that is managed in the home page asset. Little does the controller know, the template is going to take over and start to act like a controller — grabbing other models and applying other templates to them.
Placeholder Application Controller is one of those patterns that, once you think about it, you realize you use it all the time. It is convenient and practical but be careful with it because it is easy to get carried away. The main risk of the PAC pattern is that you are going against the grain of the WCMS architecture. Templates are supposed to be for formatting only. You may be pushing the templating language a little farther than it was intended to go and your code may become unmanageable. You also may be short-circuiting the security controls provided by the controller. Some WCMS platforms have a pluggable architecture that allows 3rd party modules (programmed in something other than the template language) to step in and play the roles of model, view, and controller. This helps keep the architecture cleaner but there will always be some limitations on how these modules are allowed to work. After a certain point, you will be better off going with a generic web application framework that affords you more flexibility and just use the WCMS to publish content into your custom web application. But that is a much larger undertaking.