<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should you host your intranet and corporate website on one platform?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contenthere.net/2009/11/should-you-host-your-intranet-and-corporate-website-on-one-platform.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contenthere.net/2009/11/should-you-host-your-intranet-and-corporate-website-on-one-platform.html</link>
	<description>Enter Content Here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seth</title>
		<link>http://www.contenthere.net/2009/11/should-you-host-your-intranet-and-corporate-website-on-one-platform.html/comment-page-1#comment-1960</link>
		<dc:creator>seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contenthere.net/?p=1287#comment-1960</guid>
		<description>Hi Gordon, you are right.  Drupal is not the best tool for managing different areas of a website.  You might look into other platforms that have a more hierarchical site structure.  On the PHP stack, I know you can do this with eZ Publish.  I am pretty sure you can do this with Silverstripe as well.  Shoot me an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.contenthere.net/about/contact&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;email&lt;/a&gt; if you want to discuss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gordon, you are right.  Drupal is not the best tool for managing different areas of a website.  You might look into other platforms that have a more hierarchical site structure.  On the PHP stack, I know you can do this with eZ Publish.  I am pretty sure you can do this with Silverstripe as well.  Shoot me an <a href="http://www.contenthere.net/about/contact" rel="nofollow">email</a> if you want to discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.contenthere.net/2009/11/should-you-host-your-intranet-and-corporate-website-on-one-platform.html/comment-page-1#comment-1959</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contenthere.net/?p=1287#comment-1959</guid>
		<description>Seth, thanks for your informative reply. Our situation is actually a little more complicated: We have our own website &amp; intranet. On top of this, we want to offer our clients their websites and intranets, all under our &#039;umbrella&#039;.

I&#039;ve set up a basic experimental multisite Drupal installation here, but rather than the second site being our own intranet, it is the website of our client. I was hoping to be able to set up many of these for many clients. Then, I was hoping to be able to make each site (ours &amp; our clients&#039;) all &#039;dual-purpose&#039;, each hosting both website and intranet. As you put it - &#039;to manage “areas” of a site for different audiences&#039;. But this now looks to be impossible... Am I correct?

Thanks in advance!
Gordon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth, thanks for your informative reply. Our situation is actually a little more complicated: We have our own website &amp; intranet. On top of this, we want to offer our clients their websites and intranets, all under our &#8216;umbrella&#8217;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve set up a basic experimental multisite Drupal installation here, but rather than the second site being our own intranet, it is the website of our client. I was hoping to be able to set up many of these for many clients. Then, I was hoping to be able to make each site (ours &amp; our clients&#8217;) all &#8216;dual-purpose&#8217;, each hosting both website and intranet. As you put it &#8211; &#8216;to manage “areas” of a site for different audiences&#8217;. But this now looks to be impossible&#8230; Am I correct?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!<br />
Gordon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seth</title>
		<link>http://www.contenthere.net/2009/11/should-you-host-your-intranet-and-corporate-website-on-one-platform.html/comment-page-1#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contenthere.net/?p=1287#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>I would recommend using a &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/node/43816&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Multi-Site&quot; setup&lt;/a&gt; where you run multiple sites on the same core but each site has its own database and configurations.  Modules and themes can be shared across sites but can be activated/selected at the site level.  Content, however, is not shared across sites.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drupaltherapy.com/node/34&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;You can rig Drupal to push feeds from one site to another&lt;/a&gt;.  

The reason to go with two sites is that Drupal&#039;s access control is unwieldy to manage &quot;areas&quot; of a site for different audiences.  The content hierarchy is totally flat.  The multiple site configuration will also allow the different sites to independently adapt to the diverging requirements of your intranet and website through the configuration of modules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would recommend using a <a href="http://drupal.org/node/43816" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Multi-Site&#8221; setup</a> where you run multiple sites on the same core but each site has its own database and configurations.  Modules and themes can be shared across sites but can be activated/selected at the site level.  Content, however, is not shared across sites.  <a href="http://www.drupaltherapy.com/node/34" rel="nofollow">You can rig Drupal to push feeds from one site to another</a>.  </p>
<p>The reason to go with two sites is that Drupal&#8217;s access control is unwieldy to manage &#8220;areas&#8221; of a site for different audiences.  The content hierarchy is totally flat.  The multiple site configuration will also allow the different sites to independently adapt to the diverging requirements of your intranet and website through the configuration of modules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.contenthere.net/2009/11/should-you-host-your-intranet-and-corporate-website-on-one-platform.html/comment-page-1#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contenthere.net/?p=1287#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>Very interesting discussion!

I&#039;m weighing up the possibilities of using Drupal to create a system where a company can run its Intranet and website from the same installation. If anyone has advice - or can post useful links - then I&#039;d love to hear!

Regards
G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting discussion!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m weighing up the possibilities of using Drupal to create a system where a company can run its Intranet and website from the same installation. If anyone has advice &#8211; or can post useful links &#8211; then I&#8217;d love to hear!</p>
<p>Regards<br />
G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.contenthere.net/2009/11/should-you-host-your-intranet-and-corporate-website-on-one-platform.html/comment-page-1#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contenthere.net/?p=1287#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>I think you should have the same platform but different environments. It is very expensive maintain knowledge of two different platforms, in case you want to do customization or addons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should have the same platform but different environments. It is very expensive maintain knowledge of two different platforms, in case you want to do customization or addons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.contenthere.net/2009/11/should-you-host-your-intranet-and-corporate-website-on-one-platform.html/comment-page-1#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contenthere.net/?p=1287#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>Really helpful post.  In our view, the underlying use cases - not to mention the business objectives - of public facing websites and intranets to differ so dramatically that it&#039;s hard to imagine a solution that could manage both without huge customization efforts.  In many cases, in fact, you see multiple platforms or systems within the intranet itself to deal with top down info dissemination (the paid leave form, the H1N1 policy) and bottom-up social computing (wiki, blogs, content rankings etc.)  In this case, intranet/enterprise search becomes critical and must span both.  Make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really helpful post.  In our view, the underlying use cases &#8211; not to mention the business objectives &#8211; of public facing websites and intranets to differ so dramatically that it&#8217;s hard to imagine a solution that could manage both without huge customization efforts.  In many cases, in fact, you see multiple platforms or systems within the intranet itself to deal with top down info dissemination (the paid leave form, the H1N1 policy) and bottom-up social computing (wiki, blogs, content rankings etc.)  In this case, intranet/enterprise search becomes critical and must span both.  Make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Cronin</title>
		<link>http://www.contenthere.net/2009/11/should-you-host-your-intranet-and-corporate-website-on-one-platform.html/comment-page-1#comment-1620</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Cronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contenthere.net/?p=1287#comment-1620</guid>
		<description>I recognise each of the points you are making, and I agree with them; however, I&#039;d like to note that it&#039;s quite possible for a single WCM system to have a range of features that allow the implementor to make radically different choices when building an intranet or an Internet site. 

It&#039;s not always wise to use the same platform for both, and attempting to share content between the two is often a bad idea, but when an organisation has invested in a fully featured system, and trained its people accordingly, it can often make sense to have a common system.

(I work mostly with Tridion implementations.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recognise each of the points you are making, and I agree with them; however, I&#8217;d like to note that it&#8217;s quite possible for a single WCM system to have a range of features that allow the implementor to make radically different choices when building an intranet or an Internet site. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not always wise to use the same platform for both, and attempting to share content between the two is often a bad idea, but when an organisation has invested in a fully featured system, and trained its people accordingly, it can often make sense to have a common system.</p>
<p>(I work mostly with Tridion implementations.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
