Comments on: Alfresco and E2CM http://www.contenthere.net/2008/05/alfresco-and-e2cm.html Enter Content Here Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:28:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Seth http://www.contenthere.net/2008/05/alfresco-and-e2cm.html/comment-page-1#comment-666 Seth Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:42:00 +0000 http://www1.contenthere.net/2008/05/alfresco-and-e2cm.html#comment-666 ADW only works with the Community Edition of Alfresco which production sites are discouraged to use. The functionality will be rolled into Enterprise Edition 3.0 (not sure when it will be released) so I would wait for that. ADW only works with the Community Edition of Alfresco which production sites are discouraged to use. The functionality will be rolled into Enterprise Edition 3.0 (not sure when it will be released) so I would wait for that.

]]> By: Cody Coggins http://www.contenthere.net/2008/05/alfresco-and-e2cm.html/comment-page-1#comment-665 Cody Coggins Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:38:00 +0000 http://www1.contenthere.net/2008/05/alfresco-and-e2cm.html#comment-665 Has anyone tried Alfresco Dynamic Website? http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Alfresco_Dynamic_Website<br/><br/>It promises to do better with WCM - I'm wondering how it lives up to the promise. Has anyone tried Alfresco Dynamic Website? http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Alfresco_Dynamic_Website

It promises to do better with WCM – I’m wondering how it lives up to the promise.

]]> By: James Robertson http://www.contenthere.net/2008/05/alfresco-and-e2cm.html/comment-page-1#comment-648 James Robertson Sat, 17 May 2008 00:48:00 +0000 http://www1.contenthere.net/2008/05/alfresco-and-e2cm.html#comment-648 My only concern is that these are all fundamentally 'document management' tools at their heart, and this makes for a pretty limited view of collaboration, sharing and community.<br/><br/>So while some tools are more open than others, they all still tend to fall back on interactions around 'objects' (mostly documents).<br/><br/>Note that this is no different to the web content management vendors, who see the whole world as being built on 'pages'.<br/><br/>With the relatively immaturity of the market at present, I think organisations need to plan on mixing-and-matching tools for the immediate future, and beware of putting all their eggs in the one 'framework' basket.<br/><br/>Cheers, James My only concern is that these are all fundamentally ‘document management’ tools at their heart, and this makes for a pretty limited view of collaboration, sharing and community.

So while some tools are more open than others, they all still tend to fall back on interactions around ‘objects’ (mostly documents).

Note that this is no different to the web content management vendors, who see the whole world as being built on ‘pages’.

With the relatively immaturity of the market at present, I think organisations need to plan on mixing-and-matching tools for the immediate future, and beware of putting all their eggs in the one ‘framework’ basket.

Cheers, James

]]>